Comparison

Backerbsen vs Dinkel Backerbsen

Overall, Dinkel Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBackerbsenDinkel Backerbsen
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 520 kcal 513 kcal
Fat 29 g 29 g
Saturated fat 2.4 g 2.6 g
Sugars 1 g 0.6 g
Salt 2.5 g 2.5 g
Fiber 4 g 3.9 g
Protein 7.8 g 8.1 g
Additives04
AllergensGluten, MilkGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Dinkel Backerbsen has 40% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1 g).

Ingredients

Backerbsen

56% Weizenmehl", 27% Sonnenblumenöl*, Maismehl*, Speisesalz, Magermilchpulver*, Muskat*, Backpulver* (Maisstärke*, Säuerungsmittel: Monoka - liumtartrat, Backtriebmittel: Natriumhydrogencarbonat) *aus kontrolliert biologischem Anbau Trocken lagern und vor Licht und Wärme schützen.

Dinkel Backerbsen

Dinkelmehl, Sonnenblumenöl, Maismehl, Steinsalz, Magermilchpulver, Muskat, Backpulver (Maisstärke, Säuerungsmittel: Reinweinstein (Monokaliumtartrat), Backtriebmittel: Natriumhydrogencarbonat)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Backerbsen or Dinkel Backerbsen?

Overall, Dinkel Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dinkel Backerbsen has fewer calories: 513 kcal versus 520 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Dinkel Backerbsen has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons