Comparison

Dinkel Backerbsen vs Backerbsen

Overall, Dinkel Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDinkel BackerbsenBackerbsen
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 513 kcal 553 kcal
Fat 29 g 35 g
Saturated fat 2.6 g 17 g
Sugars 0.6 g 2 g
Salt 2.5 g 1.9 g
Fiber 3.9 g 7.4 g
Protein 8.1 g 8 g
Additives40
AllergensGluten, MilkEggs, Gluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Dinkel Backerbsen has 17% less fat (29 g vs 35 g).
  • Dinkel Backerbsen has 85% less saturated fat (2.6 g vs 17 g).
  • Dinkel Backerbsen has 70% less sugar (0.6 g vs 2 g).
  • Backerbsen has 24% less salt (1.9 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Backerbsen has 48% more fiber (7.4 g vs 3.9 g).
  • Only Backerbsen lists: Eggs.

Ingredients

Dinkel Backerbsen

Dinkelmehl, Sonnenblumenöl, Maismehl, Steinsalz, Magermilchpulver, Muskat, Backpulver (Maisstärke, Säuerungsmittel: Reinweinstein (Monokaliumtartrat), Backtriebmittel: Natriumhydrogencarbonat)

Backerbsen

Búzaliszt, pálmazsír, étkezési só, tojáspor, sovány tejpor, élesztő.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Dinkel Backerbsen or Backerbsen?

Overall, Dinkel Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dinkel Backerbsen has fewer calories: 513 kcal versus 553 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Dinkel Backerbsen has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons