Backerbsen vs Backerbsen
Overall, Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Backerbsen | Backerbsen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 514 kcal | 553 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 15.9 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 3.3 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | — | 7.4 g |
| Protein | 8.7 g | 8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk | Eggs, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Backerbsen has 14% less fat (30 g vs 35 g).
- Backerbsen has 50% less sugar (2 g vs 4 g).
- Backerbsen has 42% less salt (1.9 g vs 3.3 g).
- Backerbsen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Backerbsen
Weizenmehl, Palmöl, Süßmolkenpulver, Maismehl, Salz, Backtriebmittel (E 450, E 500), Stärke, Volleipulver
Backerbsen
Búzaliszt, pálmazsír, étkezési só, tojáspor, sovány tejpor, élesztő.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Backerbsen or Backerbsen?
Overall, Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Backerbsen has fewer calories: 514 kcal versus 553 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Backerbsen has less sugar: 2 g versus 4 g per 100 g.