Backerbsen vs Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen
Overall, Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Backerbsen | Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbse... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 514 kcal | 511 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 15.9 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 4 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 3.3 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.9 g |
| Protein | 8.7 g | 7.8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk | Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen has 85% less saturated fat (2.4 g vs 15.9 g).
- Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen has 75% less sugar (1 g vs 4 g).
- Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen has 24% less salt (2.5 g vs 3.3 g).
- Backerbsen has 10% more protein (8.7 g vs 7.8 g).
- Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Backerbsen lists: Eggs.
Ingredients
Backerbsen
Weizenmehl, Palmöl, Süßmolkenpulver, Maismehl, Salz, Backtriebmittel (E 450, E 500), Stärke, Volleipulver
Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen
_Weizenmehl_ (56%), Sonnenblumenöl, Maismehl, Steinsalz, _Magermilchpulver_, Muskat, Backpulver (Maisstärke, Säuerungsmittel: Kaliumtartrate aus Bio-Traubensaft, Backtriebmittel: Natriumhydrogencarbonat)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Backerbsen or Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen?
Overall, Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen has fewer calories: 511 kcal versus 514 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen has less sugar: 1 g versus 4 g per 100 g.