Comparison

Backerbsen vs Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBackerbsenSchwäbische Weizen-Backerbse...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 520 kcal 511 kcal
Fat 29 g 28 g
Saturated fat 2.4 g 2.4 g
Sugars 1 g 1 g
Salt 2.5 g 2.5 g
Fiber 4 g 3.9 g
Protein 7.8 g 7.8 g
Additives02
AllergensGluten, MilkGluten, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Ingredients

Backerbsen

56% Weizenmehl", 27% Sonnenblumenöl*, Maismehl*, Speisesalz, Magermilchpulver*, Muskat*, Backpulver* (Maisstärke*, Säuerungsmittel: Monoka - liumtartrat, Backtriebmittel: Natriumhydrogencarbonat) *aus kontrolliert biologischem Anbau Trocken lagern und vor Licht und Wärme schützen.

Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen

_Weizenmehl_ (56%), Sonnenblumenöl, Maismehl, Steinsalz, _Magermilchpulver_, Muskat, Backpulver (Maisstärke, Säuerungsmittel: Kaliumtartrate aus Bio-Traubensaft, Backtriebmittel: Natriumhydrogencarbonat)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Backerbsen or Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Schwäbische Weizen-Backerbsen has fewer calories: 511 kcal versus 520 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Backerbsen has less sugar: 1 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons