Backerbsen vs Backerbsen
Overall, Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Backerbsen | Backerbsen |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 553 kcal | 522 kcal |
| Fat | 35 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 1.9 g | 2.3 g |
| Fiber | 7.4 g | 4.7 g |
| Protein | 8 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Eggs, Gluten, Milk | Eggs, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Backerbsen has 14% less fat (30 g vs 35 g).
- Backerbsen has 35% less saturated fat (11 g vs 17 g).
- Backerbsen has 17% less salt (1.9 g vs 2.3 g).
- Backerbsen has 37% more fiber (7.4 g vs 4.7 g).
- Backerbsen has 11% more protein (9 g vs 8 g).
Ingredients
Backerbsen
Búzaliszt, pálmazsír, étkezési só, tojáspor, sovány tejpor, élesztő.
Backerbsen
Weizenmehl, Sonnenblumenöl 30%, Salz, Erbsenmehl, Volleipulver, Hefe, Magermilchpulver
FAQ
Which is healthier: Backerbsen or Backerbsen?
Overall, Backerbsen has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Backerbsen has fewer calories: 522 kcal versus 553 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Backerbsen has less sugar: 2 g versus 2 g per 100 g.