Comparison

Schlemmerfilet Champignon vs 4 Fiori di merluzzo

Overall, 4 Fiori di merluzzo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSchlemmerfilet Champignon4 Fiori di merluzzo
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 169 kcal 74 kcal
Fat 11 g 1.1 g
Saturated fat 0.8 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0.6 g 0 g
Salt 1 g 0.3 g
Fiber 1 g 0 g
Protein 10 g 16 g
Additives00
AllergensFish, Gluten, MustardNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • 4 Fiori di merluzzo has 56% fewer calories (74 kcal vs 169 kcal).
  • 4 Fiori di merluzzo has 90% less fat (1.1 g vs 11 g).
  • 4 Fiori di merluzzo has 63% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 0.8 g).
  • 4 Fiori di merluzzo has no sugar, while Schlemmerfilet Champignon has 0.6 g.
  • 4 Fiori di merluzzo has 69% less salt (0.3 g vs 1 g).
  • Schlemmerfilet Champignon has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
  • 4 Fiori di merluzzo has 38% more protein (16 g vs 10 g).
  • 4 Fiori di merluzzo has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Schlemmerfilet Champignon lists: Fish, Gluten, Mustard.

Ingredients

Schlemmerfilet Champignon

Alaska Seelachs-Filet (52%), Champignons (13%), Rapsöl, Paniermehl (Weizenmehl, Wasser, Hefe, Salz), Wasser, Zwiebel, Senf (Wasser, Senfsaat, Branntweinessig, Salz, Gewürze), Petersilie, Knoblauch, Salz, Stärke, Pfeffer, Paprikapulver, Zwiebelpulver.

4 Fiori di merluzzo

Porzioni di Filetti di MERLUZZO SUDAFRICANO surgelati

FAQ

Which is healthier: Schlemmerfilet Champignon or 4 Fiori di merluzzo?

Overall, 4 Fiori di merluzzo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

4 Fiori di merluzzo has fewer calories: 74 kcal versus 169 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

4 Fiori di merluzzo has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons