Comparison
Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala vs Salsa verde
Overall, Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala | Salsa verde |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 372 kcal | 459 kcal |
| Fat | 22.1 g | 45 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.7 g | 5.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 9.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 19% fewer calories (372 kcal vs 459 kcal).
- Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 51% less fat (22.1 g vs 45 g).
- Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 49% less saturated fat (2.7 g vs 5.3 g).
- Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has no sugar, while Salsa verde has 9.5 g.
- Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 67% less salt (1 g vs 3 g).
- Salsa verde has 20% more fiber (1.5 g vs 1.2 g).
- Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 32% more protein (2.5 g vs 1.7 g).
- Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala
Piment rouge 48%, Piment cascabel 32%, Huile d’olive 20%, Ail, Sel
Salsa verde
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala or Salsa verde?
Overall, Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has fewer calories: 372 kcal versus 459 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has less sugar: 0 g versus 9.5 g per 100 g.