Persto Basil vs Salsa verde
Overall, Persto Basil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Persto Basil | Salsa verde |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 446 kcal | 459 kcal |
| Fat | 44.6 g | 45 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.4 g | 5.3 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 9.5 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 3 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 1.7 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Persto Basil has 81% less sugar (1.8 g vs 9.5 g).
- Persto Basil has 51% less salt (1.5 g vs 3 g).
- Persto Basil has 58% more fiber (3.6 g vs 1.5 g).
- Persto Basil has 52% more protein (3.6 g vs 1.7 g).
- Persto Basil has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Persto Basil lists: Nuts, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Persto Basil
Basil, sunflower oil, cashew, potato flakes (potatoes, rosemary extract), tofu (water, soybeans, magnesium chloride), extra-virgin olive oil, pine nuts, salt, cane sugar, garlic powder, citric acid.
Salsa verde
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Persto Basil or Salsa verde?
Overall, Persto Basil has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Persto Basil has fewer calories: 446 kcal versus 459 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Persto Basil has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 9.5 g per 100 g.