Persto Basil vs Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala
Overall, Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Persto Basil | Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 446 kcal | 372 kcal |
| Fat | 44.6 g | 22.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.4 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 2.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 17% fewer calories (372 kcal vs 446 kcal).
- Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 50% less fat (22.1 g vs 44.6 g).
- Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 50% less saturated fat (2.7 g vs 5.4 g).
- Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has no sugar, while Persto Basil has 1.8 g.
- Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 32% less salt (1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Persto Basil has 66% more fiber (3.6 g vs 1.2 g).
- Persto Basil has 30% more protein (3.6 g vs 2.5 g).
- Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Persto Basil lists: Nuts, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Persto Basil
Basil, sunflower oil, cashew, potato flakes (potatoes, rosemary extract), tofu (water, soybeans, magnesium chloride), extra-virgin olive oil, pine nuts, salt, cane sugar, garlic powder, citric acid.
Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala
Piment rouge 48%, Piment cascabel 32%, Huile d’olive 20%, Ail, Sel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Persto Basil or Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala?
Overall, Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has fewer calories: 372 kcal versus 446 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.