Medium Salsa vs Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala
Overall, Medium Salsa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Medium Salsa | Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 33 kcal | 372 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 22.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 2.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Medium Salsa has 91% fewer calories (33 kcal vs 372 kcal).
- Medium Salsa has no fat, while Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 22.1 g.
- Medium Salsa has no saturated fat, while Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 2.7 g.
- Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has no sugar, while Medium Salsa has 3 g.
- Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 60% more protein (2.5 g vs 1 g).
- Medium Salsa has the better Nutri-Score.
- Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Medium Salsa
Tomato puree (water, tomato paste), Diced tomatoes (tomatoes, tomato juice, calcium chloride, citric acid), Jalapeño peppers, Onions, Vinegar, Salt, Garlic powder, Natural flavour
Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala
Piment rouge 48%, Piment cascabel 32%, Huile d’olive 20%, Ail, Sel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Medium Salsa or Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala?
Overall, Medium Salsa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Medium Salsa has fewer calories: 33 kcal versus 372 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has less sugar: 0 g versus 3 g per 100 g.