Comparison

Persto Basil vs Salsa verde

Overall, Salsa verde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPersto BasilSalsa verde
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 446 kcal 12 kcal
Fat 44.6 g 0.7 g
Saturated fat 5.4 g 0 g
Sugars 1.8 g 0.6 g
Salt 1.5 g 3 g
Fiber 3.6 g —
Protein 3.6 g 0.5 g
Additives20
AllergensNuts, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salsa verde has 97% fewer calories (12 kcal vs 446 kcal).
  • Salsa verde has 98% less fat (0.7 g vs 44.6 g).
  • Salsa verde has no saturated fat, while Persto Basil has 5.4 g.
  • Salsa verde has 66% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.8 g).
  • Persto Basil has 51% less salt (1.5 g vs 3 g).
  • Persto Basil has 86% more protein (3.6 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Only Persto Basil lists: Nuts, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Persto Basil

Basil, sunflower oil, cashew, potato flakes (potatoes, rosemary extract), tofu (water, soybeans, magnesium chloride), extra-virgin olive oil, pine nuts, salt, cane sugar, garlic powder, citric acid.

Salsa verde

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Persto Basil or Salsa verde?

Overall, Salsa verde has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salsa verde has fewer calories: 12 kcal versus 446 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salsa verde has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons