Comparison

Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala vs Salsa verde

Overall, Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalsa Macha. Pepe ComalaSalsa verde
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 372 kcal 12 kcal
Fat 22.1 g 0.7 g
Saturated fat 2.7 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 0.6 g
Salt 1 g 3 g
Fiber 1.2 g —
Protein 2.5 g 0.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salsa verde has 97% fewer calories (12 kcal vs 372 kcal).
  • Salsa verde has 97% less fat (0.7 g vs 22.1 g).
  • Salsa verde has no saturated fat, while Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 2.7 g.
  • Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has no sugar, while Salsa verde has 0.6 g.
  • Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 67% less salt (1 g vs 3 g).
  • Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 80% more protein (2.5 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala

Piment rouge 48%, Piment cascabel 32%, Huile d’olive 20%, Ail, Sel

Salsa verde

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala or Salsa verde?

Overall, Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salsa verde has fewer calories: 12 kcal versus 372 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons