Comparison

Salsa verde vs Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala

Overall, Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

Nutrient	Salsa verde	Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala
Nutri-Score	e	c
NOVA group	—	3
Calories	1 kcal	372 kcal
Fat	0 g	22.1 g
Saturated fat	0 g	2.7 g
Sugars	0 g	0 g
Salt	4 g	1 g
Fiber	—	1.2 g
Protein	0 g	2.5 g
Additives	0	0
Allergens	None listed	None listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

Salsa verde has 100% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 372 kcal).
Salsa verde has no fat, while Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 22.1 g.
Salsa verde has no saturated fat, while Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 2.7 g.
Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 75% less salt (1 g vs 4 g).
Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 100% more protein (2.5 g vs 0 g).
Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Salsa verde

Not available.

Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala

Piment rouge 48%, Piment cascabel 32%, Huile d’olive 20%, Ail, Sel

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salsa verde or Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala?

Overall, Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salsa verde has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 372 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salsa verde has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons

Persto Basil vs Salsa verde Medium Salsa vs Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala Medium Salsa vs Salsa verde Persto Basil vs Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala Sauce Guacamole vs Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala vs Salsa verde Salsa verde vs Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala vs Salsa verde