Comparison
Salsa verde vs Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala
Overall, Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salsa verde | Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 41 kcal | 372 kcal |
| Fat | 1.9 g | 22.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 3.8 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.2 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 2.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Salsa verde has 89% fewer calories (41 kcal vs 372 kcal).
- Salsa verde has 91% less fat (1.9 g vs 22.1 g).
- Salsa verde has 93% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 2.7 g).
- Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has no sugar, while Salsa verde has 3.8 g.
- Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 55% less salt (1 g vs 2.2 g).
- Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has 56% more protein (2.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Salsa verde
Not available.
Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala
Piment rouge 48%, Piment cascabel 32%, Huile d’olive 20%, Ail, Sel
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salsa verde or Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala?
Overall, Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salsa verde has fewer calories: 41 kcal versus 372 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salsa Macha. Pepe Comala has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.