Rye cocoa flakes MILZU! POWER vs Copos de Centeno
Overall, Copos de Centeno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Rye cocoa flakes MILZU! POWE... | Copos de Centeno |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 322 kcal | 333 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 10.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 11.8 g | 13 g |
| Protein | 8.3 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Copos de Centeno has 92% less sugar (0.9 g vs 10.7 g).
- Copos de Centeno has no salt, while Rye cocoa flakes MILZU! POWER has 0.3 g.
- Copos de Centeno has 17% more protein (10 g vs 8.3 g).
- Copos de Centeno is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Rye cocoa flakes MILZU! POWER
_rye_ flour 83%, sugar syrup, sugar, low-fat cocoa powder 4%, sea salt
Copos de Centeno
Copos de Centeno* ( de Producción Biológica)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Rye cocoa flakes MILZU! POWER or Copos de Centeno?
Overall, Copos de Centeno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Rye cocoa flakes MILZU! POWER has fewer calories: 322 kcal versus 333 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Copos de Centeno has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 10.7 g per 100 g.