Platki zytnie vs Copos de Centeno
Overall, Copos de Centeno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Platki zytnie | Copos de Centeno |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 367 kcal | 333 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 8.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | 13 g |
| Protein | 6.8 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Platki zytnie has 35% less fat (1.3 g vs 2 g).
- Copos de Centeno has 90% less sugar (0.9 g vs 8.6 g).
- Copos de Centeno has no salt, while Platki zytnie has 1.1 g.
- Copos de Centeno has 23% more fiber (13 g vs 10 g).
- Copos de Centeno has 32% more protein (10 g vs 6.8 g).
- Copos de Centeno has the better Nutri-Score.
- Copos de Centeno is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Platki zytnie
_Rye_ flour, sugar, _barley_ malt extract, salt, antioxidant: tocopherol-rich extract. Product may contain milk
Copos de Centeno
Copos de Centeno* ( de Producción Biológica)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Platki zytnie or Copos de Centeno?
Overall, Copos de Centeno has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Copos de Centeno has fewer calories: 333 kcal versus 367 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Copos de Centeno has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 8.6 g per 100 g.