Roomkaas Garlan vs Goudkuipje
Overall, Goudkuipje has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Roomkaas Garlan | Goudkuipje |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 267 kcal | 162 kcal |
| Fat | 26 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 14 g |
| Sugars | 2.8 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | — |
| Protein | 4.8 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | Milk, Mustard | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Goudkuipje has 39% fewer calories (162 kcal vs 267 kcal).
- Goudkuipje has 23% less fat (20 g vs 26 g).
- Goudkuipje has 18% less saturated fat (14 g vs 17 g).
- Goudkuipje has 39% less sugar (1.7 g vs 2.8 g).
- Roomkaas Garlan has no salt, while Goudkuipje has 2.1 g.
- Goudkuipje has 66% more protein (14 g vs 4.8 g).
- Roomkaas Garlan has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Roomkaas Garlan lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Roomkaas Garlan
Magere MELK, ROOM, zout, BOTER, 0.2% kruiden (peterselie, basilicum), 0.2% knoflookextract (tapioca, maltodextrine, palmpitvet, WEIPOEDER, knoflookolie), 0.1% mierikswortelbereiding (mierikswortel, water, koolzaadolie, zout), 0.1% knoflookgranulaat, azijn, witte peper, zuursel (MELK)
Goudkuipje
ROOMZACHTE SMEERKAAS 48 , Ingrediënten: koas (melk), water, boter (melk), melkeiwitten, weipoeder (melk), smeltzouten (E452, E339, E451), zout,-Koel bewaren tussen 4°C en 8°C, V N
FAQ
Which is healthier: Roomkaas Garlan or Goudkuipje?
Overall, Goudkuipje has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Goudkuipje has fewer calories: 162 kcal versus 267 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Goudkuipje has less sugar: 1.7 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.