Comparison

Roasted Makhana Sriracha Spice vs Salt & Pepper Makhana

Overall, Salt & Pepper Makhana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientRoasted Makhana Sriracha Spi...Salt & Pepper Makhana
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 430 kcal 394 kcal
Fat 10 g 5.6 g
Saturated fat 5 g 2.5 g
Sugars 4 g 0 g
Salt 2.2 g 1 g
Fiber 2 g —
Protein 9 g 9.9 g
Additives10
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Salt & Pepper Makhana has 44% less fat (5.6 g vs 10 g).
  • Salt & Pepper Makhana has 51% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 5 g).
  • Salt & Pepper Makhana has no sugar, while Roasted Makhana Sriracha Spice has 4 g.
  • Salt & Pepper Makhana has 58% less salt (1 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Salt & Pepper Makhana has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Roasted Makhana Sriracha Spice is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Roasted Makhana Sriracha Spice lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Roasted Makhana Sriracha Spice

Makhana (75%), Sriracha Seasoning (12%) (Salt, Sugar, Chilli Powder, Milk Powder, Beet Root Powder, Citric Acid, Yeast Extract, Lemon Juice Powder, Garlic Powder, Onion Powder, Tamarind Powder, Cheese Powder), Edible Vegetable Oil (Palmolein Oil).

Salt & Pepper Makhana

Fox Nuts, Edible Vegetable Oil (Rice Bran Oil), Pepper Rock Salt, Dry Mango Powder. CONTAINS PERMITTED NATURAL COLOUR AND ADDED FLAVOUR.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Roasted Makhana Sriracha Spice or Salt & Pepper Makhana?

Overall, Salt & Pepper Makhana has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Salt & Pepper Makhana has fewer calories: 394 kcal versus 430 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Salt & Pepper Makhana has less sugar: 0 g versus 4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons