Comparison
Regaña vs Regaña
Overall, Regaña has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Regaña | Regaña |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 388 kcal | 448 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 2.3 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 2.6 g |
| Salt | 2.6 g | 1.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.7 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 11.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten, Sesame seeds |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Regaña has 13% fewer calories (388 kcal vs 448 kcal).
- Regaña has 90% less fat (1.5 g vs 15 g).
- Regaña has 57% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2.3 g).
- Regaña has 62% less sugar (1 g vs 2.6 g).
- Regaña has 31% less salt (1.8 g vs 2.6 g).
- Only Regaña lists: Gluten, Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Regaña
Not available.
Regaña
Wheat flour, extra virgin olive oil(10%), sesame seeds, salt, yeast
FAQ
Which is healthier: Regaña or Regaña?
Overall, Regaña has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Regaña has fewer calories: 388 kcal versus 448 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Regaña has less sugar: 1 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.