Comparison
Quark vs Arki Pehmeä Rahka
Overall, Quark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Quark | Arki Pehmeä Rahka |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 66 kcal | 59 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 3.5 g | 3.8 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 11.5 g | 9.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Arki Pehmeä Rahka has 10% fewer calories (59 kcal vs 66 kcal).
- Quark has 67% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Quark has no saturated fat, while Arki Pehmeä Rahka has 0.4 g.
- Quark has 20% more protein (11.5 g vs 9.2 g).
- Arki Pehmeä Rahka is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Quark
Fat free skimmed milk soft cheese. Allergy advice: contains milk. Suitable for vegetarians.
Arki Pehmeä Rahka
Pastöroitu kirnumaito, rasvaton maito, hapate
FAQ
Which is healthier: Quark or Arki Pehmeä Rahka?
Overall, Quark has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Arki Pehmeä Rahka has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 66 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Quark has less sugar: 3.5 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.