Puy lentils and whole grain quinoa vs Restaurant Style Cantina Beans
Overall, Restaurant Style Cantina Beans has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Puy lentils and whole grain quinoa
Restaurant Style Cantina Beans
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Puy lentils and whole grain... | Restaurant Style Cantina Bea... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 138 kcal | 80 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 7 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 2.8 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 4.3 g | 5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Restaurant Style Cantina Beans has 42% fewer calories (80 kcal vs 138 kcal).
- Restaurant Style Cantina Beans has 86% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.5 g).
- Restaurant Style Cantina Beans has no saturated fat, while Puy lentils and whole grain quinoa has 0.4 g.
- Restaurant Style Cantina Beans has 86% less sugar (1 g vs 7 g).
- Restaurant Style Cantina Beans has 90% less salt (0.3 g vs 2.8 g).
- Restaurant Style Cantina Beans has 14% more protein (5 g vs 4.3 g).
- Restaurant Style Cantina Beans has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Puy lentils and whole grain quinoa
Not available.
Restaurant Style Cantina Beans
Cooked Black Beans (65%) (Black Beans, Water), Water, Salt, Onion, Safflower Oil and Garlic
FAQ
Which is healthier: Puy lentils and whole grain quinoa or Restaurant Style Cantina Beans?
Overall, Restaurant Style Cantina Beans has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Restaurant Style Cantina Beans has fewer calories: 80 kcal versus 138 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Restaurant Style Cantina Beans has less sugar: 1 g versus 7 g per 100 g.