Pure Creamed Coconut vs Cooking COCO 18%
Overall, Cooking COCO 18% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pure Creamed Coconut | Cooking COCO 18% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 604 kcal | 185 kcal |
| Fat | 65 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 53.4 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 6.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 5.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cooking COCO 18% has 69% fewer calories (185 kcal vs 604 kcal).
- Cooking COCO 18% has 72% less fat (18 g vs 65 g).
- Cooking COCO 18% has 70% less saturated fat (16 g vs 53.4 g).
- Cooking COCO 18% has 94% less sugar (0.4 g vs 6.4 g).
- Pure Creamed Coconut has 84% more protein (5.6 g vs 0.9 g).
- Cooking COCO 18% has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pure Creamed Coconut is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Pure Creamed Coconut
Desiccated Coconut, Sodium Metabisulphite (E223)
Cooking COCO 18%
ekstrakt z kokosa 79,1 % (woda, ekstrakt miąższu z kokosa), tłuszcz kokosowy 15,6 %, mąka tapiokowa, białka bobu, substancja zagęszczająca: pektyny, wegańskie kultury bakterii.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pure Creamed Coconut or Cooking COCO 18%?
Overall, Cooking COCO 18% has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cooking COCO 18% has fewer calories: 185 kcal versus 604 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cooking COCO 18% has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 6.4 g per 100 g.