Comparison

Cooking COCO 18% vs Nata Thai

Overall, Nata Thai has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCooking COCO 18%Nata Thai
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 185 kcal 127 kcal
Fat 18 g 12 g
Saturated fat 16 g 4 g
Sugars 0.4 g 3 g
Salt 0 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0 g
Protein 0.9 g 1.3 g
Additives12
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Nata Thai has 31% fewer calories (127 kcal vs 185 kcal).
  • Nata Thai has 33% less fat (12 g vs 18 g).
  • Nata Thai has 75% less saturated fat (4 g vs 16 g).
  • Cooking COCO 18% has 87% less sugar (0.4 g vs 3 g).
  • Cooking COCO 18% has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Nata Thai has 31% more protein (1.3 g vs 0.9 g).

Ingredients

Cooking COCO 18%

ekstrakt z kokosa 79,1 % (woda, ekstrakt miąższu z kokosa), tłuszcz kokosowy 15,6 %, mąka tapiokowa, białka bobu, substancja zagęszczająca: pektyny, wegańskie kultury bakterii.

Nata Thai

Lait de coco" (60%), eau, curry rouge" (sel marin, piment“ (0,2%), jus Concentré de citron vert (0,1%), citronnelle" (0,03%) et épices* (06%: al", gingembre", coriandre", poivre noir", paprika"), stabilisants (gomme xanthane, gomme guar), arôme naturel de coco", "Ingredients issus de l'agriculture biologique). Fabriqué dans une usine où sont également traités des fruits à coque.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cooking COCO 18% or Nata Thai?

Overall, Nata Thai has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Nata Thai has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 185 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cooking COCO 18% has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons