Coco cuisine vs Nata Thai
Overall, Nata Thai has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coco cuisine | Nata Thai |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 155 kcal | 127 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nata Thai has 18% fewer calories (127 kcal vs 155 kcal).
- Nata Thai has 67% less saturated fat (4 g vs 12 g).
- Coco cuisine has 67% less sugar (1 g vs 3 g).
- Coco cuisine has 19% more protein (1.6 g vs 1.3 g).
- Nata Thai has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Coco cuisine
Not available.
Nata Thai
Lait de coco" (60%), eau, curry rouge" (sel marin, piment“ (0,2%), jus Concentré de citron vert (0,1%), citronnelle" (0,03%) et épices* (06%: al", gingembre", coriandre", poivre noir", paprika"), stabilisants (gomme xanthane, gomme guar), arôme naturel de coco", "Ingredients issus de l'agriculture biologique). Fabriqué dans une usine où sont également traités des fruits à coque.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coco cuisine or Nata Thai?
Overall, Nata Thai has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nata Thai has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 155 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coco cuisine has less sugar: 1 g versus 3 g per 100 g.