Coco cuisine vs Kokos cuisine
Overall, Kokos cuisine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coco cuisine | Kokos cuisine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 155 kcal | 130 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 12 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kokos cuisine has 16% fewer calories (130 kcal vs 155 kcal).
- Coco cuisine has 29% less sugar (1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Coco cuisine has 31% more protein (1.6 g vs 1.1 g).
- Kokos cuisine has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Coco cuisine
Not available.
Kokos cuisine
Kokosmilch* 70% (Kokosextrakt* 60%, Wasser), Wasser, Verdickungsmittel: Guarkernmehl*, Johannisbrotkernmehl*, Meersalz *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft. Kann Spuren von Soja, Mandel und Nüssen enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coco cuisine or Kokos cuisine?
Overall, Kokos cuisine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kokos cuisine has fewer calories: 130 kcal versus 155 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Coco cuisine has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.