Coco cuisine vs Cooking COCO 18%
Overall, Coco cuisine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Coco cuisine | Cooking COCO 18% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 155 kcal | 185 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 1.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coco cuisine has 16% fewer calories (155 kcal vs 185 kcal).
- Coco cuisine has 28% less fat (13 g vs 18 g).
- Coco cuisine has 25% less saturated fat (12 g vs 16 g).
- Cooking COCO 18% has 60% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1 g).
- Coco cuisine has 44% more protein (1.6 g vs 0.9 g).
- Cooking COCO 18% has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Coco cuisine
Not available.
Cooking COCO 18%
ekstrakt z kokosa 79,1 % (woda, ekstrakt miąższu z kokosa), tłuszcz kokosowy 15,6 %, mąka tapiokowa, białka bobu, substancja zagęszczająca: pektyny, wegańskie kultury bakterii.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Coco cuisine or Cooking COCO 18%?
Overall, Coco cuisine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coco cuisine has fewer calories: 155 kcal versus 185 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cooking COCO 18% has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1 g per 100 g.