Lait d'amande et châtaigne vs Cooking COCO 18%
Overall, Lait d'amande et châtaigne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Lait d'amande et châtaigne | Cooking COCO 18% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 60 kcal | 185 kcal |
| Fat | 6 g | 18 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.5 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Lait d'amande et châtaigne has 68% fewer calories (60 kcal vs 185 kcal).
- Lait d'amande et châtaigne has 67% less fat (6 g vs 18 g).
- Lait d'amande et châtaigne has 66% less saturated fat (5.5 g vs 16 g).
- Cooking COCO 18% has 67% more protein (0.9 g vs 0.3 g).
Ingredients
Lait d'amande et châtaigne
Amandes dégraissées partiellement 25% (Sicile ou Espagne), farine de châtaigne 25% (France ou Italie), sirop de riz déshydraté, farine de riz, fibre d'acacia, arôme naturel vanille.
Cooking COCO 18%
ekstrakt z kokosa 79,1 % (woda, ekstrakt miąższu z kokosa), tłuszcz kokosowy 15,6 %, mąka tapiokowa, białka bobu, substancja zagęszczająca: pektyny, wegańskie kultury bakterii.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Lait d'amande et châtaigne or Cooking COCO 18%?
Overall, Lait d'amande et châtaigne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Lait d'amande et châtaigne has fewer calories: 60 kcal versus 185 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Lait d'amande et châtaigne has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.4 g per 100 g.