Kokos cuisine vs Nata Thai
Overall, Kokos cuisine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kokos cuisine | Nata Thai |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 130 kcal | 127 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 12 g | 4 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 3 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 1.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nata Thai has 67% less saturated fat (4 g vs 12 g).
- Kokos cuisine has 53% less sugar (1.4 g vs 3 g).
- Kokos cuisine has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Kokos cuisine
Kokosmilch* 70% (Kokosextrakt* 60%, Wasser), Wasser, Verdickungsmittel: Guarkernmehl*, Johannisbrotkernmehl*, Meersalz *aus biologischer Landwirtschaft. Kann Spuren von Soja, Mandel und Nüssen enthalten.
Nata Thai
Lait de coco" (60%), eau, curry rouge" (sel marin, piment“ (0,2%), jus Concentré de citron vert (0,1%), citronnelle" (0,03%) et épices* (06%: al", gingembre", coriandre", poivre noir", paprika"), stabilisants (gomme xanthane, gomme guar), arôme naturel de coco", "Ingredients issus de l'agriculture biologique). Fabriqué dans une usine où sont également traités des fruits à coque.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kokos cuisine or Nata Thai?
Overall, Kokos cuisine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nata Thai has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 130 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kokos cuisine has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 3 g per 100 g.