Comparison
Polvo em azeite vs Carpaccio di polpo
Overall, Carpaccio di polpo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Polvo em azeite | Carpaccio di polpo |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 2 | — |
| Calories | 104 kcal | 95 kcal |
| Fat | 4.4 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 16.5 g | 20 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Molluscs | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Carpaccio di polpo has 77% less fat (1 g vs 4.4 g).
- Carpaccio di polpo has 80% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 2 g).
- Polvo em azeite has no sugar, while Carpaccio di polpo has 1.4 g.
- Polvo em azeite has 55% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.5 g).
- Carpaccio di polpo has 17% more protein (20 g vs 16.5 g).
- Carpaccio di polpo has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Polvo em azeite lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
Polvo em azeite
Poulpe 57%, huile d'olive, sel
Carpaccio di polpo
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Polvo em azeite or Carpaccio di polpo?
Overall, Carpaccio di polpo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Carpaccio di polpo has fewer calories: 95 kcal versus 104 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Polvo em azeite has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.