Polpo cotto al naturale vs Poulpe cuisiné à la galicienne
Overall, Polpo cotto al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Polpo cotto al naturale
Poulpe cuisiné à la galicienne
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Polpo cotto al naturale | Poulpe cuisiné à la galicien... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 77 kcal | 141 kcal |
| Fat | 1.5 g | 7.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 15 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Molluscs | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Polpo cotto al naturale has 45% fewer calories (77 kcal vs 141 kcal).
- Polpo cotto al naturale has 81% less fat (1.5 g vs 7.7 g).
- Polpo cotto al naturale has 55% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Polpo cotto al naturale has 33% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
- Poulpe cuisiné à la galicienne has 17% more protein (18 g vs 15 g).
- Only Polpo cotto al naturale lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
Polpo cotto al naturale
Polpo (molluschi) (Octopus cyanea), sale, acqua
Poulpe cuisiné à la galicienne
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Polpo cotto al naturale or Poulpe cuisiné à la galicienne?
Overall, Polpo cotto al naturale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Polpo cotto al naturale has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 141 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Polpo cotto al naturale has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.