Comparison
Plums vs Prunes - Confiture
Overall, Plums has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Plums | Prunes - Confiture |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 380 kcal | 241 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 33 g | 59 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5.6 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Prunes - Confiture has 37% fewer calories (241 kcal vs 380 kcal).
- Prunes - Confiture has 95% less fat (0.1 g vs 2 g).
- Prunes - Confiture has no saturated fat, while Plums has 0.4 g.
- Plums has 44% less sugar (33 g vs 59 g).
- Plums has 77% more fiber (5.6 g vs 1.3 g).
- Plums has 96% more protein (10 g vs 0.4 g).
- Plums has the better Nutri-Score.
- Plums is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Plums
Plums (Angeleno)
Prunes - Confiture
prunes, sucre, sucre roux de canne, jus de citron concentré et, éventuellement, gélifiant : pectine de fruits,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Plums or Prunes - Confiture?
Overall, Plums has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Prunes - Confiture has fewer calories: 241 kcal versus 380 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Plums has less sugar: 33 g versus 59 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Prunes - Confiture vs Pflaumen Zwetschgen
Prunes - Confiture vs Californian pitted prune...
Prunes - Confiture vs Soft-Pflaumen aus kontro...
Prunes - Confiture vs Pflaumen
British Plums vs Prunes - Confiture
Prunes - Confiture vs Pflaumen
Plums vs Pflaumen Zwetschgen
Plums vs Californian pitted prune...