Plums vs Californian pitted prunes in juice
Overall, Californian pitted prunes in juice has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Plums | Californian pitted prunes in... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 380 kcal | 127 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 33 g | 23.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 5.6 g | 3.4 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 1.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Californian pitted prunes in juice has 67% fewer calories (127 kcal vs 380 kcal).
- Californian pitted prunes in juice has 85% less fat (0.3 g vs 2 g).
- Californian pitted prunes in juice has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Californian pitted prunes in juice has 29% less sugar (23.4 g vs 33 g).
- Plums has 39% more fiber (5.6 g vs 3.4 g).
- Plums has 89% more protein (10 g vs 1.1 g).
- Californian pitted prunes in juice has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Plums
Plums (Angeleno)
Californian pitted prunes in juice
Prunes, Apple Juice From Concentrate.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Plums or Californian pitted prunes in juice?
Overall, Californian pitted prunes in juice has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Californian pitted prunes in juice has fewer calories: 127 kcal versus 380 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Californian pitted prunes in juice has less sugar: 23.4 g versus 33 g per 100 g.