Comparison

Pipas sin sal vs Pipas Reyes

Overall, Pipas sin sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPipas sin salPipas Reyes
Nutri-Score — a
NOVA group 1 3
Calories 101 kcal 591 kcal
Fat 5.8 g 48.4 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 4.8 g
Sugars 0.5 g 3.4 g
Salt — 0.5 g
Fiber 10 g 4.8 g
Protein 3.6 g 27.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNoneNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pipas sin sal has 83% fewer calories (101 kcal vs 591 kcal).
  • Pipas sin sal has 88% less fat (5.8 g vs 48.4 g).
  • Pipas sin sal has 85% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Pipas sin sal has 85% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.4 g).
  • Pipas sin sal has 52% more fiber (10 g vs 4.8 g).
  • Pipas Reyes has 87% more protein (27.5 g vs 3.6 g).
  • Pipas sin sal is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Pipas sin sal lists: None.

Ingredients

Pipas sin sal

Pipas de girasol.

Pipas Reyes

Pipa de girasol, agua y sal. Puede contener trazas de cacahuetes y frutos secos de cáscara.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pipas sin sal or Pipas Reyes?

Overall, Pipas sin sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pipas sin sal has fewer calories: 101 kcal versus 591 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pipas sin sal has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.

More comparisons