Pipas sin sal vs Pipas Reyes
Overall, Pipas sin sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pipas sin sal | Pipas Reyes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 101 kcal | 591 kcal |
| Fat | 5.8 g | 48.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 4.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 3.4 g |
| Salt | — | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 10 g | 4.8 g |
| Protein | 3.6 g | 27.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pipas sin sal has 83% fewer calories (101 kcal vs 591 kcal).
- Pipas sin sal has 88% less fat (5.8 g vs 48.4 g).
- Pipas sin sal has 85% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 4.8 g).
- Pipas sin sal has 85% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.4 g).
- Pipas sin sal has 52% more fiber (10 g vs 4.8 g).
- Pipas Reyes has 87% more protein (27.5 g vs 3.6 g).
- Pipas sin sal is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Pipas sin sal lists: None.
Ingredients
Pipas sin sal
Pipas de girasol.
Pipas Reyes
Pipa de girasol, agua y sal. Puede contener trazas de cacahuetes y frutos secos de cáscara.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pipas sin sal or Pipas Reyes?
Overall, Pipas sin sal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pipas sin sal has fewer calories: 101 kcal versus 591 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pipas sin sal has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.4 g per 100 g.