Comparison

Picos Saladitos vs Picos 100% integrales

Overall, Picos 100% integrales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPicos SaladitosPicos 100% integrales
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 3 3
Calories 466 kcal 379 kcal
Fat 18.3 g 6.4 g
Saturated fat 1.6 g 0.8 g
Sugars 1.2 g 3.1 g
Salt 2.3 g 2.1 g
Fiber — 11 g
Protein 9.7 g 14 g
Additives00
AllergensGlutenGluten, Mustard, Sesame seeds

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Picos 100% integrales has 19% fewer calories (379 kcal vs 466 kcal).
  • Picos 100% integrales has 65% less fat (6.4 g vs 18.3 g).
  • Picos 100% integrales has 50% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Picos Saladitos has 61% less sugar (1.2 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Picos 100% integrales has 31% more protein (14 g vs 9.7 g).
  • Picos 100% integrales has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Picos 100% integrales lists: Mustard, Sesame seeds.

Ingredients

Picos Saladitos

wheat flour, high oleic sunflower oil, (2%) salt, yeast, wheat malt flour and barley malt extract,

Picos 100% integrales

Harina integral de trigo (gluten) (86%), levadura, aceite de girasol alto oleico, sal y agente de tratamiento de la harina: acido ascorbico. Puede contener trazas de cacahuetes, soja, dervivados lacteos, mostaza y sesamo

FAQ

Which is healthier: Picos Saladitos or Picos 100% integrales?

Overall, Picos 100% integrales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Picos 100% integrales has fewer calories: 379 kcal versus 466 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Picos Saladitos has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons