Picos camperos de jerez vs Picos 100% integrales
Overall, Picos 100% integrales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Picos camperos de jerez | Picos 100% integrales |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 394 kcal | 379 kcal |
| Fat | 2.3 g | 6.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 2.9 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 11 g |
| Protein | 11.5 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Mustard, Sesame seeds |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Picos camperos de jerez has 64% less fat (2.3 g vs 6.4 g).
- Picos camperos de jerez has 50% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
- Picos 100% integrales has 67% more fiber (11 g vs 3.6 g).
- Picos 100% integrales has 18% more protein (14 g vs 11.5 g).
- Picos 100% integrales has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Picos 100% integrales lists: Mustard, Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Picos camperos de jerez
Harina de trigo (Gluten), Sal, -
Picos 100% integrales
Harina integral de trigo (gluten) (86%), levadura, aceite de girasol alto oleico, sal y agente de tratamiento de la harina: acido ascorbico. Puede contener trazas de cacahuetes, soja, dervivados lacteos, mostaza y sesamo
FAQ
Which is healthier: Picos camperos de jerez or Picos 100% integrales?
Overall, Picos 100% integrales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Picos 100% integrales has fewer calories: 379 kcal versus 394 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Picos camperos de jerez has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.