Picos vs Picos 100% integrales
Overall, Picos 100% integrales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Picos | Picos 100% integrales |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 416 kcal | 379 kcal |
| Fat | 6.2 g | 6.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 2.6 g | 3.1 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 2.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 11 g |
| Protein | 11.2 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Gluten, Mustard, Sesame seeds |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Picos has 16% less sugar (2.6 g vs 3.1 g).
- Picos 100% integrales has 80% more fiber (11 g vs 2.2 g).
- Picos 100% integrales has 20% more protein (14 g vs 11.2 g).
- Picos 100% integrales has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Picos 100% integrales lists: Mustard, Sesame seeds.
Ingredients
Picos
Harina de trigo (gluten), aceite de girasol alto oleico, levadura, sal y aceite de oliva virgen extra
Picos 100% integrales
Harina integral de trigo (gluten) (86%), levadura, aceite de girasol alto oleico, sal y agente de tratamiento de la harina: acido ascorbico. Puede contener trazas de cacahuetes, soja, dervivados lacteos, mostaza y sesamo
FAQ
Which is healthier: Picos or Picos 100% integrales?
Overall, Picos 100% integrales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Picos 100% integrales has fewer calories: 379 kcal versus 416 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Picos has less sugar: 2.6 g versus 3.1 g per 100 g.