Picos integrales vs Picos
Overall, Picos integrales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Picos integrales | Picos |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 400 kcal | 416 kcal |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 6.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 2.6 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 4.4 g | 2.2 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 11.2 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Picos integrales has 55% less fat (2.8 g vs 6.2 g).
- Picos integrales has 50% more fiber (4.4 g vs 2.2 g).
- Picos is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Picos integrales lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
Picos integrales
91% harina de _trigo_ integral, agua, 4% levadura, 2.19% aceite de girasol alto oleico, 1.8% sal, 1% aceite de oliva virgen extra, emulgentes, lecitina de _soja_, antioxidante (ácido ascórbico).
Picos
Harina de trigo (gluten), aceite de girasol alto oleico, levadura, sal y aceite de oliva virgen extra
FAQ
Which is healthier: Picos integrales or Picos?
Overall, Picos integrales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Picos integrales has fewer calories: 400 kcal versus 416 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Picos integrales has less sugar: 2.5 g versus 2.6 g per 100 g.