Picos integrales vs Picos sin gluten
Overall, Picos integrales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Picos integrales | Picos sin gluten |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 400 kcal | 392 kcal |
| Fat | 2.8 g | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 2.5 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 4.4 g | 2.3 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 2.9 g |
| Additives | 3 | 3 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Picos integrales has 20% less fat (2.8 g vs 3.5 g).
- Picos sin gluten has 20% less sugar (2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Picos integrales has 15% less salt (1.7 g vs 2 g).
- Picos integrales has 48% more fiber (4.4 g vs 2.3 g).
- Picos integrales has 74% more protein (11 g vs 2.9 g).
- Only Picos integrales lists: Gluten, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Picos integrales
91% harina de _trigo_ integral, agua, 4% levadura, 2.19% aceite de girasol alto oleico, 1.8% sal, 1% aceite de oliva virgen extra, emulgentes, lecitina de _soja_, antioxidante (ácido ascórbico).
Picos sin gluten
Almidón de maíz, harina de arroz, aceite de girasol alto oleico (3,1%), levadura, fécula de patata, jarabe de azúcar invertido, estabilizantes (hidroxipropilmetilcelulosa, goma xantana, goma guar), azúcar, sal,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Picos integrales or Picos sin gluten?
Overall, Picos integrales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Picos sin gluten has fewer calories: 392 kcal versus 400 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Picos sin gluten has less sugar: 2 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.