Comparison

Picos integrales vs Picos Saladitos

Overall, Picos integrales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPicos integralesPicos Saladitos
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 400 kcal 466 kcal
Fat 2.8 g 18.3 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 1.6 g
Sugars 2.5 g 1.2 g
Salt 1.7 g 2.3 g
Fiber 4.4 g —
Protein 11 g 9.7 g
Additives30
AllergensGluten, SoybeansGluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Picos integrales has 14% fewer calories (400 kcal vs 466 kcal).
  • Picos integrales has 85% less fat (2.8 g vs 18.3 g).
  • Picos integrales has 75% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Picos Saladitos has 52% less sugar (1.2 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Picos integrales has 25% less salt (1.7 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Picos integrales has 12% more protein (11 g vs 9.7 g).
  • Picos Saladitos is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Picos integrales lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Picos integrales

91% harina de _trigo_ integral, agua, 4% levadura, 2.19% aceite de girasol alto oleico, 1.8% sal, 1% aceite de oliva virgen extra, emulgentes, lecitina de _soja_, antioxidante (ácido ascórbico).

Picos Saladitos

wheat flour, high oleic sunflower oil, (2%) salt, yeast, wheat malt flour and barley malt extract,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Picos integrales or Picos Saladitos?

Overall, Picos integrales has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Picos integrales has fewer calories: 400 kcal versus 466 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Picos Saladitos has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 2.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons