Pata negra Jamón de Bellota 100% Ibérico vs Paleta bellota ibérica 50% raza ibérica
Overall, Paleta bellota ibérica 50% raza ibérica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Pata negra Jamón de Bellota 100% Ibérico
Paleta bellota ibérica 50% raza ibérica
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pata negra Jamón de Bellota... | Paleta bellota ibérica 50% r... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 425 kcal | 409 kcal |
| Fat | 33 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 9 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 4.8 g | 3.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 29 g | 30 g |
| Additives | 3 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pata negra Jamón de Bellota 100% Ibérico has 18% less saturated fat (9 g vs 11 g).
- Paleta bellota ibérica 50% raza ibérica has 19% less salt (3.9 g vs 4.8 g).
- Paleta bellota ibérica 50% raza ibérica is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Pata negra Jamón de Bellota 100% Ibérico
Jambon de porc de bellota 100% race ibérique, sel, antioxydants : ascorbate de sodium et citrate de sodium, conservateur : nitrate de potassium, dextrose, sucre.
Paleta bellota ibérica 50% raza ibérica
Paleta de bellota ibérico (de cerdo), sal, azúcar, corrector de acidez (E-331iii), conservadores (E-252 y E-250).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pata negra Jamón de Bellota 100% Ibérico or Paleta bellota ibérica 50% raza ibérica?
Overall, Paleta bellota ibérica 50% raza ibérica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Paleta bellota ibérica 50% raza ibérica has fewer calories: 409 kcal versus 425 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pata negra Jamón de Bellota 100% Ibérico has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.