Paleta bellota ibérica 50% raza ibérica vs Paleta mangalica
Overall, Paleta mangalica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Paleta bellota ibérica 50% raza ibérica
Paleta mangalica
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Paleta bellota ibérica 50% r... | Paleta mangalica |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 409 kcal | 272 kcal |
| Fat | 30 g | 16 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 5.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 3.9 g | 5 g |
| Protein | 30 g | 32 g |
| Additives | 4 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Paleta mangalica has 33% fewer calories (272 kcal vs 409 kcal).
- Paleta mangalica has 47% less fat (16 g vs 30 g).
- Paleta mangalica has 52% less saturated fat (5.3 g vs 11 g).
- Paleta mangalica has no sugar, while Paleta bellota ibérica 50% raza ibérica has 0.5 g.
- Paleta bellota ibérica 50% raza ibérica has 22% less salt (3.9 g vs 5 g).
Ingredients
Paleta bellota ibérica 50% raza ibérica
Paleta de bellota ibérico (de cerdo), sal, azúcar, corrector de acidez (E-331iii), conservadores (E-252 y E-250).
Paleta mangalica
Paleta de cerdo mangalica, sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Paleta bellota ibérica 50% raza ibérica or Paleta mangalica?
Overall, Paleta mangalica has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Paleta mangalica has fewer calories: 272 kcal versus 409 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Paleta mangalica has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.