Comparison

Pastels de bâta vs Pastel de Nata

Overall, Pastel de Nata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPastels de bâtaPastel de Nata
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 290 kcal 296 kcal
Fat 12 g 14.5 g
Saturated fat 4.6 g 7.6 g
Sugars 17 g 8.7 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.9 g
Fiber 0.5 g 1.4 g
Protein 4.3 g 4.9 g
Additives06
AllergensNone listedEggs, Gluten, Lupin, Milk, Molluscs

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pastels de bâta has 17% less fat (12 g vs 14.5 g).
  • Pastels de bâta has 39% less saturated fat (4.6 g vs 7.6 g).
  • Pastel de Nata has 49% less sugar (8.7 g vs 17 g).
  • Pastel de Nata has 64% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Pastel de Nata has 12% more protein (4.9 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Only Pastel de Nata lists: Eggs, Gluten, Lupin, Milk, Molluscs.

Ingredients

Pastels de bâta

Not available.

Pastel de Nata

Wasser, Weizenmehl, Zucker, Margarine [pflanzliche Öle (Sonnenblume, Palm), Wasser, Salz, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Konservierungsstoff: Sorbinsäure; Emulgatoren: Mono - und Diglyceride von Speisefettsäuren, Lecithine, Ascorbyl palmit - at; Vitamin E, Farbstoff: Carotin; Aromen], Eigelb, Vollei, Glukosesirup, Milchpulver, Maisstärke, modifizierte Stärke, natürliche Aromen. Kann Spuren von Fisch, Erdnüssen, Soja, Schalenfrüchten, Sellerie, Senf, Sesam, Sulfit, Lupine, Schalentieren und Weichtieren enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pastels de bâta or Pastel de Nata?

Overall, Pastel de Nata has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pastels de bâta has fewer calories: 290 kcal versus 296 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pastel de Nata has less sugar: 8.7 g versus 17 g per 100 g.

More comparisons