Comparison
Paranoten vs Paranüsse
Overall, Paranüsse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Paranoten | Paranüsse |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 692 kcal | 698 kcal |
| Fat | 67 g | 67 g |
| Saturated fat | 17.2 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4.3 g | 7 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 17 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts, Verpakt in een bedrijf waar ook pinda en sesamzaad worden verwerkt | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Paranüsse has 39% more fiber (7 g vs 4.3 g).
- Paranüsse has 12% more protein (17 g vs 15 g).
- Only Paranoten lists: Verpakt in een bedrijf waar ook pinda en sesamzaad worden verwerkt.
Ingredients
Paranoten
Paranoten
Paranüsse
brazil nut
FAQ
Which is healthier: Paranoten or Paranüsse?
Overall, Paranüsse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Paranoten has fewer calories: 692 kcal versus 698 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Paranoten has less sugar: 2 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.