Comparison

Paranoten vs Coquito crudo natural

Overall, Coquito crudo natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientParanotenCoquito crudo natural
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 1 1
Calories 692 kcal 659 kcal
Fat 67 g 67 g
Saturated fat 17.2 g 16 g
Sugars 2 g 2.3 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 4.3 g 7.5 g
Protein 15 g 14 g
Additives00
AllergensNuts, Verpakt in een bedrijf waar ook pinda en sesamzaad worden verwerktNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Coquito crudo natural has 43% more fiber (7.5 g vs 4.3 g).
  • Coquito crudo natural has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Paranoten lists: Verpakt in een bedrijf waar ook pinda en sesamzaad worden verwerkt.

Ingredients

Paranoten

Paranoten

Coquito crudo natural

_Nuez_ de Brasil.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Paranoten or Coquito crudo natural?

Overall, Coquito crudo natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Coquito crudo natural has fewer calories: 659 kcal versus 692 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Paranoten has less sugar: 2 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons