Paranoten vs Coquito crudo natural
Overall, Coquito crudo natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Paranoten | Coquito crudo natural |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 692 kcal | 659 kcal |
| Fat | 67 g | 67 g |
| Saturated fat | 17.2 g | 16 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 4.3 g | 7.5 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts, Verpakt in een bedrijf waar ook pinda en sesamzaad worden verwerkt | Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Coquito crudo natural has 43% more fiber (7.5 g vs 4.3 g).
- Coquito crudo natural has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Paranoten lists: Verpakt in een bedrijf waar ook pinda en sesamzaad worden verwerkt.
Ingredients
Paranoten
Paranoten
Coquito crudo natural
_Nuez_ de Brasil.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Paranoten or Coquito crudo natural?
Overall, Coquito crudo natural has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Coquito crudo natural has fewer calories: 659 kcal versus 692 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Paranoten has less sugar: 2 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.