Comparison
Paranusskerne vs Paranoten
Overall, Paranusskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Paranusskerne | Paranoten |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 707 kcal | 692 kcal |
| Fat | 68 g | 67 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 17.2 g |
| Sugars | 4.1 g | 2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 6.6 g | 4.3 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 15 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Nuts | Nuts, Verpakt in een bedrijf waar ook pinda en sesamzaad worden verwerkt |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Paranoten has 51% less sugar (2 g vs 4.1 g).
- Paranusskerne has 35% more fiber (6.6 g vs 4.3 g).
- Paranusskerne has 12% more protein (17 g vs 15 g).
- Only Paranoten lists: Verpakt in een bedrijf waar ook pinda en sesamzaad worden verwerkt.
Ingredients
Paranusskerne
Paranusskerne.
Paranoten
Paranoten
FAQ
Which is healthier: Paranusskerne or Paranoten?
Overall, Paranusskerne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Paranoten has fewer calories: 692 kcal versus 707 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Paranoten has less sugar: 2 g versus 4.1 g per 100 g.