Comparison

Pané au colin d'Alaska vs Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC panés - 220g - Frais

Overall, Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC panés - 220g - Frais has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPané au colin d'AlaskaFilets de colin d'Alaska MSC...
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 202 kcal 204 kcal
Fat 8.8 g 8.4 g
Saturated fat 0.9 g 0.8 g
Sugars 0.6 g 1.1 g
Salt 0.8 g 0.5 g
Fiber 1.1 g —
Protein 10.9 g 12 g
Additives20
AllergensFish, GlutenFish, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pané au colin d'Alaska has 50% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC panés - 220g - Frais has 46% less salt (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC panés - 220g - Frais has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Pané au colin d'Alaska

colin d'Alaska 59%, eau, amidon modifié, sel, épaississant: E461, curcuma, paprika, enrobant (eau, farine de blé), huile végétales

Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC panés - 220g - Frais

Filets de COLIN D'ALASKA MSC 65%. Enrobage 35%: chapelure (farine de BLÉ, levure, sel), enrobant (farine de BLÉ, eau, sel, GLUTEN de BLÉ), huiles végétales (colza et tournesol en proportion variable). Traces possibles de LAIT, OEUF, MOLLUSQUES, CÉLERI, SOJA.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pané au colin d'Alaska or Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC panés - 220g - Frais?

Overall, Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC panés - 220g - Frais has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pané au colin d'Alaska has fewer calories: 202 kcal versus 204 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pané au colin d'Alaska has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons