2 Panés au colin d'Alaska MSC vs Pané au colin d'Alaska
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 2 Panés au colin d'Alaska MS... | Pané au colin d'Alaska |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 209 kcal | 202 kcal |
| Fat | 8.8 g | 8.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 10.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten, Molluscs | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Only 2 Panés au colin d'Alaska MSC lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
2 Panés au colin d'Alaska MSC
66% colin d'Alaska (Theragra chalcogramma) MSC (poissons), 16% chapelure (farine de blé, levure, sel, épices : curcuma, paprika), huiles végétales (colza et tournesol en proportion variable), eau, farine de blé, amidon modifié de pomme de terre, épaississant: méthylcellulose, sel. Traces éventuelles de lait, d'œufs, de soja, de céleri et de mollusques.
Pané au colin d'Alaska
colin d'Alaska 59%, eau, amidon modifié, sel, épaississant: E461, curcuma, paprika, enrobant (eau, farine de blé), huile végétales
FAQ
Which is healthier: 2 Panés au colin d'Alaska MSC or Pané au colin d'Alaska?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pané au colin d'Alaska has fewer calories: 202 kcal versus 209 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pané au colin d'Alaska has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.