2 Panés au colin d'Alaska MSC vs Filets de colin d'Alaska
Overall, Filets de colin d'Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
2 Panés au colin d'Alaska MSC
Filets de colin d'Alaska
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | 2 Panés au colin d'Alaska MS... | Filets de colin d'Alaska |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 209 kcal | 170 kcal |
| Fat | 8.8 g | 6.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten, Molluscs | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de colin d'Alaska has 19% fewer calories (170 kcal vs 209 kcal).
- Filets de colin d'Alaska has 23% less fat (6.8 g vs 8.8 g).
- Filets de colin d'Alaska has 14% more protein (14 g vs 12 g).
- Filets de colin d'Alaska has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only 2 Panés au colin d'Alaska MSC lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
2 Panés au colin d'Alaska MSC
66% colin d'Alaska (Theragra chalcogramma) MSC (poissons), 16% chapelure (farine de blé, levure, sel, épices : curcuma, paprika), huiles végétales (colza et tournesol en proportion variable), eau, farine de blé, amidon modifié de pomme de terre, épaississant: méthylcellulose, sel. Traces éventuelles de lait, d'œufs, de soja, de céleri et de mollusques.
Filets de colin d'Alaska
Filet de _colin d'Alaska_ MSC 75 %; Enrobage 25% (eau, huiles végétales (colza et tournesol en proportion variable), farine de _blé_, amidon de _blé_, fécule de pomme de terre, farine de riz, _gluten de blé_, farine de maïs, sel, dextrose, semoule de _blé_, épices, huile de citron, huile de citron vert, amidon de tapioca, persil déshydraté).
FAQ
Which is healthier: 2 Panés au colin d'Alaska MSC or Filets de colin d'Alaska?
Overall, Filets de colin d'Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de colin d'Alaska has fewer calories: 170 kcal versus 209 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de colin d'Alaska has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.