Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC panés - 220g - Frais vs Filets de colin d'Alaska
Overall, Filets de colin d'Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC panés - 220g - Frais
Filets de colin d'Alaska
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC... | Filets de colin d'Alaska |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 204 kcal | 170 kcal |
| Fat | 8.4 g | 6.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish, Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filets de colin d'Alaska has 17% fewer calories (170 kcal vs 204 kcal).
- Filets de colin d'Alaska has 19% less fat (6.8 g vs 8.4 g).
- Filets de colin d'Alaska has 55% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
- Filets de colin d'Alaska has 14% more protein (14 g vs 12 g).
Ingredients
Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC panés - 220g - Frais
Filets de COLIN D'ALASKA MSC 65%. Enrobage 35%: chapelure (farine de BLÉ, levure, sel), enrobant (farine de BLÉ, eau, sel, GLUTEN de BLÉ), huiles végétales (colza et tournesol en proportion variable). Traces possibles de LAIT, OEUF, MOLLUSQUES, CÉLERI, SOJA.
Filets de colin d'Alaska
Filet de _colin d'Alaska_ MSC 75 %; Enrobage 25% (eau, huiles végétales (colza et tournesol en proportion variable), farine de _blé_, amidon de _blé_, fécule de pomme de terre, farine de riz, _gluten de blé_, farine de maïs, sel, dextrose, semoule de _blé_, épices, huile de citron, huile de citron vert, amidon de tapioca, persil déshydraté).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filets de colin d'Alaska MSC panés - 220g - Frais or Filets de colin d'Alaska?
Overall, Filets de colin d'Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filets de colin d'Alaska has fewer calories: 170 kcal versus 204 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Filets de colin d'Alaska has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.